Plagiarism Policy

EDITORIAL POLICY

Plagiarism Policy

Originality, Similarity Screening, and Academic Integrity Policy of INTENSI: Journal Psychology

Intensi: Journal Psychology (INTENSI) is committed to protecting originality, intellectual honesty, and the integrity of the scholarly record. Plagiarism and other forms of inappropriate duplication are considered serious violations of academic and publication ethics.

All manuscripts submitted to INTENSI must represent original scholarly work. Authors are responsible for ensuring that ideas, theories, words, data, tables, figures, research instruments, and other materials derived from previous works are appropriately acknowledged and cited.

ORIGINALITY
Original Scholarly Work
SCREENING
Similarity Evaluation
CONTEXT
Not Percentage Alone
CORRECTIVE ACTION
Correction or Retraction
01

Definition of Plagiarism

Plagiarism occurs when an author uses another person's words, ideas, arguments, concepts, data, images, or other intellectual material without appropriate acknowledgment, thereby creating the impression that the material is the author's own original work.

Plagiarism may involve published or unpublished material and may occur through verbatim copying, inappropriate paraphrasing, translation without attribution, duplication of previously published material, or other forms of intellectual misrepresentation.

02

Forms of Plagiarism

Direct Plagiarism

Copying words, sentences, paragraphs, or other material from another source without appropriate citation, attribution, or quotation.

Self-Plagiarism

Reusing substantial portions of one's previously published words, data, analyses, or other material without appropriate citation, disclosure, or justification.

Mosaic Plagiarism

Using phrases, sentence structures, or ideas from another source while making only minor changes, substitutions, or rearrangements without providing appropriate acknowledgment.

Accidental Plagiarism

Plagiarism resulting from inappropriate citation, missing references, incorrect attribution, or inadequate paraphrasing. Lack of intention does not eliminate the author's responsibility to properly acknowledge all sources.

03

Author Responsibility for Originality

By submitting a manuscript to INTENSI, authors confirm that their work is original and that all material originating from other sources has been appropriately acknowledged.

Authors are responsible for ensuring that:

  • all sources are appropriately cited and listed in the references;
  • direct quotations are clearly identified and properly attributed;
  • paraphrased material represents genuine rewriting and not merely replacement of individual words;
  • previously published work by the same author is appropriately cited and disclosed;
  • data, tables, figures, instruments, and other materials are used with appropriate acknowledgment and permission where required; and
  • the manuscript has not been substantially duplicated from another publication.
04

Similarity Screening

Submitted manuscripts may be examined using similarity-detection software as part of the editorial screening process. The resulting similarity report is used as an editorial tool to identify possible overlap with previously available sources.

Similarity is not automatically plagiarism. A similarity percentage must be interpreted in context. Properly cited quotations, references, standard methodological terminology, author affiliations, and other legitimate matches may contribute to a similarity score without constituting plagiarism.

Conversely, a manuscript may still contain unacceptable plagiarism even when its overall similarity percentage is relatively low, particularly where there is extensive, continuous, or inadequately acknowledged copying from a single source.

05

Interpretation of Similarity Results

INTENSI does not determine plagiarism solely from the total numerical similarity percentage. Editorial assessment considers both the overall similarity report and the characteristics of individual matching sources.

The editorial evaluation may consider:

  • the total amount of overlapping material;
  • the proportion of similarity originating from individual sources;
  • whether matching passages appear consecutively within sentences or paragraphs;
  • whether the source has been appropriately cited;
  • whether quotation marks or other forms of attribution are required;
  • whether the overlap occurs in substantive intellectual content;
  • whether the material represents legitimate reuse or inappropriate text recycling; and
  • whether there is evidence of duplication of ideas, data, images, or research findings.
Editorial Principle: The nature and location of similarity are more important than a similarity percentage considered in isolation.

Plagiarism Screening Workflow

 

Manuscripts may pass through the following originality assessment process.

1
Manuscript Submission The manuscript is submitted through the journal's online submission system.
↓
2
Similarity Screening The manuscript may be checked using similarity-detection software before or during editorial evaluation.
↓
3
Editorial Evaluation Editors evaluate the similarity report, individual sources, citation practices, and the nature of potentially overlapping material.
↓
4
Editorial Decision Depending on the nature and severity of the identified overlap, the manuscript may proceed, require clarification or revision, or be rejected.
↓
5
Peer Review and Further Monitoring Manuscripts that satisfactorily pass editorial screening may proceed to peer review. Reviewers are also encouraged to report any suspected plagiarism, duplication, or inappropriate use of previously published material.
07

Plagiarism Identified Before Publication

When suspected plagiarism or inappropriate overlap is identified before publication, the Editor will evaluate the nature and extent of the problem.

Possible editorial actions include:

  • requesting clarification from the author;
  • requiring proper citation, quotation, paraphrasing, or manuscript revision;
  • requesting revision of duplicated or improperly reused material;
  • rejecting the manuscript when plagiarism is substantial or represents serious academic misconduct; and
  • taking additional action in accordance with the journal's Publication Ethics policy where necessary.
08

Plagiarism Identified After Publication

Allegations of plagiarism involving a published article will be evaluated carefully and objectively. The journal may request explanations, source materials, original data, or other supporting documentation from the author and relevant parties.

Where plagiarism or inappropriate duplication is confirmed, INTENSI will take appropriate action to protect the integrity of the scholarly record.

Correction / Corrigendum
May be issued when the identified problem can be corrected without invalidating the central findings of the article.
Expression of Concern
May be issued when serious concerns exist but further investigation or evidence is required.
Retraction
May be applied where plagiarism is substantial, the integrity of the article is seriously compromised, or the publication cannot reasonably be corrected.
09

Role of Peer Reviewers

Similarity screening by software does not replace scholarly evaluation. Peer reviewers play an important role in identifying forms of inappropriate duplication that may not be apparent from automated reports.

Reviewers are encouraged to inform the Editor when they identify possible duplication of ideas, data, images, text, research findings, or other intellectual material and should identify relevant sources whenever possible.

10

Translation and Cross-Language Plagiarism

Translating another person's published or unpublished work from one language into another does not make that material original. Ideas, arguments, data, and text translated from another source must be appropriately acknowledged and cited. Unattributed translation is considered plagiarism.

11

Duplication of Data, Figures, and Research Materials

Plagiarism and inappropriate duplication are not limited to written text. Authors must appropriately acknowledge the source of data, figures, tables, illustrations, research instruments, scales, questionnaires, assessment materials, and other research materials. Permission must be obtained where required by copyright or licensing conditions.

12

Editorial Authority

The final determination as to whether an identified similarity constitutes plagiarism or another form of publication misconduct rests with the Editor after consideration of the similarity report, relevant sources, the author's explanation, reviewer observations where applicable, and the nature and severity of the case.

Important Editorial Note

A similarity report is a screening instrument, not a final judgment of plagiarism. INTENSI evaluates originality through editorial judgment and examination of the actual sources and matching content. Authors should therefore focus on responsible citation, genuine paraphrasing, transparent reuse of previous work, and scholarly integrity rather than merely attempting to reduce a numerical similarity score.

 

Commitment to Original and Ethical Scholarship

Intensi Journal Psychology is committed to preventing plagiarism, protecting intellectual property, promoting responsible citation practices, and preserving the integrity of published psychological research.